8 June 2009
Portrait of Madame Alisa Rivoir with a Lapdog signed and dated 1914
Oil on canvas, 142 by 214 cm.
800,000-1,200,000 pounds
Provenance: Emil Salus, until 1952. State Gallery of Zlin, Czech Republic.
Restituted to Mr. Salus's niece from the above in 2001. Sotheby's London, 22 May 2002, Lot 33.
Private collection, Europe.
Authenticity has been confirmed by expert Elena Kirillina, Director of Research of Penaty, House Museum of I. Repin. Authenticity has been also confirmed by Dr. David Jackson. Authenticity has been confirmed by Vladimir Petrov.
This painted canvas is something of a puzzle. It may be described as, a “false – bottom
case”. We see a delicate female body with alabaster skin and a shy blush on her cheeks, her
fine head inclined, which it turns out has been painted over the powerful figure of the
renowned singer Feodor Ivanovich Chaliapin.
As far as auction houses are concerned, this work came to light only recently. Since a law
on restitution was brought into force, in what is now the Czech Republic, some works of art
which had been requisitioned have been returned to their former owners or their
descendents.
The town of Zlin, which during the Soviet era (1949–1989) bore the name “Gotvaldov” in what
was then Czechoslovakia, held the work in its museum. Whilst there, as I. A. Brodskiy
informs us in his article Newly discovered and little known works of I. Y. Repin (in the
collection New Developments Concerning Repin, Leningrad, 1969, p. 367), the painting was
examined with the assistance of X-rays in the National Gallery in Prague, during which
Chaliapin’s face became clearly visible on the canvas.
This confirmed the observations and testimony of close acquaintances of Repin who had
actually observed the artist in the course of his work. Anton Komashka, who lived in
Repin’s dacha “Penaty” for three years, recalled, “The portrait of Chaliapin was
suddenly, before my eyes, painted over with a nude female figure”. It would be more
accurate to say that it was only in the morning that Komashka caught sight of the painted-
over canvas on which Repin had been working in the course of the previous day. Everything
was confirmed by the words of Repin himself, who remarked after he had painted K. I.
Chukovskiy on 21 January 1926, “My portrait of Chaliapin was beyond redemption.
In no way could this unsuccessful portrait satisfy me. I painted and painted for so long,
and from memory rather than from life, and by the end I had completely painted over and
destroyed it; only his “Bul’ka” (Chaliapin’s French bulldog) remained, and so a great deal
of hard labour was wasted” (Repin. The Artistic Legacy. M-L, 1949, vol. 2, pp. 284 and
375).
In February 1914 Repin received a message from Chaliapin that he was ready to come to
“Penaty” to pose. Chaliapin’s arrival caused a great fuss. Representatives of artistic
circles arrived in Kuokkala to pay their respects to the renowned Repin and Chaliapin. They
included the famous photographer Karl Bulla, a master of reportage. He in fact created his
own visual record of Chaliapin, both in the midst of groups of guests and on his own.
We see the singer clearing snow from the top of a frozen pond, preparing to go ice skating
on the pond or standing close to a pipe as it pumped water from Repin’s artesian well, and,
of course, a number of photographs were taken in the artist’s studio itself.
The most significant frame was one taken during a meeting. Chaliapin is reclining with
Bul’ka on a Turkish divan by the window, and Repin is standing in front of a large canvas
on which we can already see a drawing of a figure sketched out in charcoal and the head
of the singer entirely painted in oil. This photograph has turned out to be a unique and
priceless document which has preserved, albeit in general outline only, the subsequently
spoiled portrait. Despite Repin exhibiting this painting at the Itinerants’ Exhibition in
Moscow in December 1914 and again in February 1915 in St. Petersburg, not a single
photograph of it has been preserved.
We can not say why Repin decided in 1917 to superimpose a nude woman on top of Chaliapin’s
figure, although we can look at a number of facts which have an indirect bearing on the
work. Komashka believed Repin repainted the canvas taking an old watercolour of Nataliya
Nordman who had died three years previously, as his subject. However, this does not seem
particularly convincing. Repin was a passionate enthusiast of painting from life, and
therefore it is more than probable he would also have painted from life when “correcting” a
work. But who was the subject?
Various memoirs recalling Repin in his later years refer to his tendency to fall in love,
which remained intact to the end of his life, and recall how at the age of 72 he became
fascinated with a French language teacher. We have established her name was Alisa Rivoir.
Repin’s archives contain a number of letters from her written in French, invariably
including the opening line, “Dear Maitre”. Letters would be sent from her to Kuokkala when
lessons or meetings were rescheduled. In the summer of 1917 Madame Rivoir mentioned she was
having problems with her passport, but she hoped that they would meet again in Paris at
some stage.
However, such a meeting was destined never to take place, and the portrait of Alisa Rivoir
remained unknown for a long time, as it was held in a private collection in Finland. It
bears the date 1918, the date of its completion by Repin. It takes only the briefest of
glances at the image to realise this nude has the same face as the one in the potrait. This
means Repin was painting from life, and he used this opportunity to paint directly
onto the canvas. Only Chaliapin’s dog Bul’ka remains from his portrait, along with Repin’s
signature and an inscription on the left side: “Il. Repin 1914”. Later, apparently at the
time of sale, Repin changed the letters of his signature to those of the Latin alphabet,
“Ilja Repin”.
So there we have a brief summary, so to speak, of the history of this painting, which is so
unusual and at the same time so interesting and intriguing.
Yelena Kirillina,
Senior Research Fellow, Penaty, House Museum of I. Repin.
Notes on symbols:
* Indicates 5% Import Duty Charge applies.
Ω Indicates 20% Import Duty Charge applies.
§ Indicates Artist's Resale Right applies.
† Indicates Standard VAT scheme applies, and the rate of 20% VAT will be charged on both hammer price and premium.